![]() In this instance, results cannot be grouped by number of productivity modules, as the speed is also important. Pumpjacks only have two module slots, so all combinations will be shown. Since pumpjacks operate on an infinite resource that has a finite count (oil wells), results will be shown in kW instead of kJ, since the goal here is to produce as much power as possible. The higher the level, the less effective productivity modules become. ![]() It is also important to note that pumpjacks are affected by mining productivity level. Using the minimum amount is important to prove that creating power from crude oil is always possible. As the amount of crude oil increases, the importance of optimal modules decreases since the power draw for a given amount of oil output also decreases. ![]() Results will be given for a depleted oil well, which provides 2 crude oil per second. Since energy costs per cycle will be the same as above but scaled (same module slot count), only the optimal combination per number of productivity modules will be shown.Ħ06,578/11kJ × 1.3 - 534,200/111kJ = 408,265,027/6,105kJīased on the above table, 100 crude oil will be given an energy worth of 9,955,904/165kJ, since this is the optimal amount of power that can be made when converting into solid fuel in non-beaconed setup. Since advanced oil processing produces more overall, its total fuel value will be used.Ĭombinations without productivity modules are omitted, since the first combination produces more net energy per cycle than the total fuel value. Since all products scale equally based on productivity, each recipe can be expressed solely as the fuel value of the products combined and that value can be scaled based on productivity below.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |